Careful What You Wish For Print
The Sugar Beat

As food manufacturers gather in San Diego this week to discuss strategy for dismantling U.S. sugar policy, sugar producers thought it would be helpful to review a study produced two years ago by a California-based commodities research firm that advises companies in both the sugar and food manufacturing sectors.
wish-lamp-sugar-policy
That study examined the repercussions of becoming dependent on foreign sugar supplies. “Be careful what you wish for,” was the warning issued at the time, and it holds particular relevance today on the heels of legislation introduced to gut no-cost sugar policy.

Luckily, Congressional leaders don’t expect this proposal to gain any traction, and national farm organizations—the American Farm Bureau Federation and National Farmers Union—have been vocal in their support for maintaining the current sugar policy.
Below is a press release distributed in February 2009 about McKeany-Flavell Company’s assessment.

Food Manufacturers Need U.S. Sugar Producers and U.S. Sugar Policy

WASHINGTON—Be careful what you wish for. That was the warning to food manufacturers in a new study released today by the American Sugar Alliance about the importance of domestic sugar producers.
Volatile prices, inconsistent quality, and delivery issues would result if the domestic food industry had to depend on foreign sugar, the study, authored by McKeany-Flavell Company, concluded.

Large candy companies have long lobbied Congress and Administration officials to harm American sugar producers through policies that would favor foreign competitors, which are often able to sell sugar at cheaper prices because of subsidies and looser environmental and labor standards.

Economic pressures on sugar producers, caused in part by unneeded imports, have taken a toll in recent years. Since 1996, 35 U.S. sugar mills and refineries have closed. If the trend continues and America’s sugar producers are pushed out of the market completely, there will be dire consequences for U.S. candy, cookie, cake, and cereal makers, the McKeany-Flavell paper explained.

“Our recommendation: be careful. Significantly greater United States dependence on imported sugar may not guarantee lower sugar pricing over the long term,” read the report. To make its case, the report cited events of the 1970s, when America had no sugar policy and depended on the world sugar market.

“Sugar prices spiked twice within that decade,” according to McKeany-Flavell, a commodities research firm from Oakland, Calf. In 1974 and 1979, raw sugar prices hit 65 cents and 40 cents per pound, respectively.

In addition to pricing concerns, the study examined other headaches that food manufacturers would face without America’s sugar industry. Among them: consistency of supply; consistency of quality; the form in which sugar is delivered; and “just-in-time delivery,” a term used to describe the domestic sugar delivery chain where sugar producers are responsible for storage, handling, and transportation under precise delivery schedules.

“[W]e must recognize the value U.S. sugar producers offer to consumers,” wrote McKeany-Flavell. “Providing consistent quality and supply, in the requested packaged form, and through just-in-time deliveries…is a very complex and difficult process that cannot be recreated overnight, if at all, through a 100-percent sugar import program.”

[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

 

Symposium

Audio & Video

  • Sugarbeet Grower Alan Welp Tells the Tale of Two Intertwined Industries
    Western Sugar, a company now owned by farmers, closed its Goodland, Kansas sugarbeet factory in 1985. Sugar prices were low, the cost of doing business was climbing, and tough decisions were made that hurt workers and farmers. Today, thanks to no-cost sugar policy, things have turned around, and business is...